Loading awesomeness.

Perspective that Works in David Hockney Paintings

David Hockney paintings and Hockney’s ideas of perspective are inspired by Chinese scrolls and Cubism.

Pearblossom Hwy (1986), is trash! It looks like the trash that is thrown from litterbugs as they drive down the highway. Blue squares that are photographs fall from the sky to the horizon about one-third of the way down. Only a few Joshua trees and street signs jut up into the daytime from the horizon. The road in the center does not advance or approach from a background, rather it falls directly down from the sky to the bottom of the canvas. The trees look hacked to bits and the roadside garbage in the lower left looks sliced and diced by an angry housewife. It’s no Michelangelo. It’s no Raphael. It’s completely faceted trash.
Ink and color on paper, handscroll.

Perspective in Chinese Scrolls

David Hockney paintings take their lessons from the Chinese… as well as eight-legged creatures of the night. It’s challenging to hang a flipbook or even Goosebumps novella on the walls of the MoMA next to the “Do Not Touch” sign. “The experience of seeing a scroll for the first time is like a revelation. As one unrolls the scroll, one has no idea what is coming next: each section presents a new surprise.” Chinese scrolls are like the famous R. L. Stine horror stories demanding the reader or viewer to move back and forth through the story. Frightening spiders… like Hockney… process many points of view in one comprehended and conceptual image. In Chinese paintings, “…Linear Perspective is not known and instead ‘Diffused Perspective’ is used, which is more conceptional in nature.” Perhaps David Hockney paintings and David Hockney himself don’t share the same eyes of an arachnid but surely process images in a similarly broad method. Hockney has adapted how the Chinese look at the world through the eyes of a spider.

David Hockney Paintings and Cubism

The expansion of Contemporary art in David Hockey’s works is rooted in Cubism as well. Like Chinese art, Cubism is also like looking through a shattered glass eye. “Hockney’s exploration of cubism was complemented by his encounter of Chinese art, in which – he discovered with excitement – the viewpoint was not fixed as it is in Renaissance perspective or a photograph…”. Cubism and Chinese art operate in a fractured way; looking through a broken lens one doesn’t see a fixed viewpoint but a broken and faceted one. In David Hockney paintings traditions of linear perspective in art have been shattered. “Instead, he absorbed qualities of the Japanese aesthetic that he found most sympathetic […]: elongated pictorial formats, asymmetrical compositions, [and] aerial perspective…” Not only is Hockney’s point of view broken but art history is left in ruins. Hockney crushes and cracks the viewer’s mind.”By breaking objects and figures down into distinct areas – or planes – the artists aimed to show different viewpoints at the same time and within the same space and so suggest their three dimensional form.” Like Cubism, this method of depicting objects gives the viewer a new attitude on how they view and consume the world. Art history and the way people experience the world through their lenses are now as faceted as David Hockney’s paintings.

Hockney, in contrast, accepted that it could be more true to actual experience, because, he believes, we don’t really perceive in the way Renaissance fixed-point perspective presents a scene – nor as a single camera lens projects it. Human beings look from different directions, with two eyes, constantly moving, as we ourselves move around and look, as Hockney puts it, ‘with memory’.” -Gayford

Chinese art and Cubism are apparent in David Hockney paintings in a couple ways. Humans don’t roam the world in a constant “space out” staring at a single point. David Hockney paintings break away from the tradition of Linear Perspective that started in the Renaissance. Renaissance paintings portray a single point at which everything recedes, but people aren’t stuck in such a static trance all their lives. Eve camera-carrying journalists portraying truth in their stories are doing it wrong. Hockney doesn’t believe the single point perspective of a camera lens is portrays the world accurately. The camera assumed to be the most objective way to capture the world, still has a single lens and a single frame of reference. But Hockney has the solutions to this way of portraying the human sight. Hockney, instead, portrays the world through two eyes and eyes that are constantly moving. Two eyes mean that one image is wrong. Two eyes that are moving mean one point of view and perspective is wrong. David Hockney paintings use perspective is exactly the same ways as Chinese scrolls and Cubist paintings.



  • Gayford, Martin. www.tate.org.uk/context-comment/articles/hockneys-world-pictures
  • www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/chhs/hd_chhs.htm
  • www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/jpon/hd_jpon.htm
  • confuciusmag.com/chinese-paintings-western-paintings
  • www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/c/cubism

Bookmark this

Mark Bradford Paintings or Collages?

Mark Bradford Paintings or Collages?

Cities live in his collages and paintings. At first glance wall-sized Mark Bradford (b. 1961) paintings are beautiful. But understanding the technique and the materials makes the work all the more powerful. The Oakland Museum of California showed an exhibit titled “Oakland, I want you to know” featuring a colorful map that showed the redlines […]

Art Parody by Dan Cretu and his Statue of David

Art Parody by Dan Cretu and his Statue of David

Can an art parody borrow more than just the recollection of an original image from another work of art? Surely a lava lamp and the glow-in-the-dark poster of a marijuana leaf are aesthetic. Right? A lava lamp may seem beautiful or tasteful to some, but perhaps not aesthetic. Aesthetics is actually a branch of philosophy just […]

Culture Hog